Post by account_disabled on Dec 27, 2023 18:58:14 GMT -8
Athe subject of the present referral are not resolved. ARE YOU COMING. Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court . From the checks carried out it follows that the constitutional court issued Decision no. of May which has as its object the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. and art. para. the last sentence of Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of August decision by which the invoked exception was rejected as inadmissible because the grounds of unconstitutionality invoked.
By the author concern the way of interpretation and application of the Country Email List criticized legal provisions in relation to the provisions of the new Civil Code an aspect of the jurisdiction of the court vested with the resolution of the dispute respectively of those hierarchically superior within the means of appeal provided by law. . The Public Ministry the Prosecutors Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice communicated that at the level of the Judicial Section the Civil Judicial Service the judicial practice has not been in order to promote a possible appeal in the interest of the law in the legal issue that forms the object of the notification. VIII. Report on the matter of law.
Through the report drawn up in the case according to art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure the judgerapporteurs assessed that the referral made by the Braov Court of Appeal Administrative and Fiscal Litigation Section under the aspect of the first question is inadmissible as it is not a genuine question of law to be analyzed by in light of the admissibility conditions provided by art. of the Civil Procedure Code. With regard to the second question they found that the notification is inadmissible from the perspective of.
By the author concern the way of interpretation and application of the Country Email List criticized legal provisions in relation to the provisions of the new Civil Code an aspect of the jurisdiction of the court vested with the resolution of the dispute respectively of those hierarchically superior within the means of appeal provided by law. . The Public Ministry the Prosecutors Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice communicated that at the level of the Judicial Section the Civil Judicial Service the judicial practice has not been in order to promote a possible appeal in the interest of the law in the legal issue that forms the object of the notification. VIII. Report on the matter of law.
Through the report drawn up in the case according to art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure the judgerapporteurs assessed that the referral made by the Braov Court of Appeal Administrative and Fiscal Litigation Section under the aspect of the first question is inadmissible as it is not a genuine question of law to be analyzed by in light of the admissibility conditions provided by art. of the Civil Procedure Code. With regard to the second question they found that the notification is inadmissible from the perspective of.